The Greedy Game

Last week, Liverpool Managing Director Ian Ayre came out with the most controversial statement that pointed to Premier League teams striking individual deals in the international market. However sane it might sound to a financial expert, for the fan, that would mean the end of the league we have come to love so much.
"Maybe the path will be individual TV rights like they do in Spain. There are so many things moving in that particular area," said Ayre. What he has failed to mention, or even realize, that La Liga is the most unbalanced leagues in the world of soccer. It’s a league where you dare not predict that anyone other than Real Madrid and Barcelona would win the league any given year. With each one earning more than 10 times the other 18 teams in the league, the best talent in the world flocks at the Bernebau and the Camp Nou.
The strength of the Premier League is the competition. Leaving aside the period in the early 2000s where the fight for the title was between Old Trafford and Highbury, later the Emirates. After the Abramovich money shower, the league has had intense competition with Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool battling it out for top honors. The fight went to the final weeks and has been so for the past few years now.
If Ayre were to have his way, then it is almost clear what would happen. The top supported teams around the globe, viz. United, Chelsea, Arsenal and Liverpool, would strike deals that could earn them millions of pounds more than the present 1/20th share of £3.2bn. This would mean that they can now offer £200,000-a-week to every player that plays for them. Hence, only the best talent from around the globe would be selected and hence unavailable to the rest of the league. It would eventually lead to a league inside a league, where these four clubs would run away with the competition. Mind you, competitive though it will be, there will be a great divide between the two mini-leagues. Robbed of their international TV income, the other clubs will start to fade, eventually calling it a day and closing shop due to insufficient funds. What would you call such a league? La Liga.

“If you're a Liverpool fan from Liverpool, you subscribe. But if you're in Kuala Lumpur there isn't anyone subscribing to Astro, or ESPN to watch Bolton, or if they are it's a very small number. Whereas the large majority are subscribing because they want to watch Liverpool, Manchester United, Chelsea or Arsenal," Ayre went on to add further. That very small number is actually a significant number. If you take away the chance for the fans in Kuala Lumpur to watch Bolton, you are leaving that team in obscurity; not affording them a chance to build on that fan base.
Ayre’s mouth may be saying the words of Liverpool owners who might wish to build on this idea. A similar idea was floated around by Richard Bevan, the League Managers’ Association chairman. He was trying to warn the world when he said that many of the foreign owners wanted to scrap the relegation and promotion concept and keep the Premier League as a separate entity. First and foremost, it is almost a separate entity, currently. Secondly, even though it is being said that the owners have never discussed such a possibility, it is hard to imagine that it has never been mentioned behind closed doors. It has been said that this idea comes, primarily, from the American owners, who own teams in the American sports markets of NFL, MLB, etc. And in these leagues, they do not have relegations and promotions. To that, there is only one answer, as far as I see it. There are no “lower” leagues in these sports. And if they are, they are not connected to each other in the way that the football in the UK (or other parts of Europe) is connected.

Financially, scrapping the current design makes sense. The owners want to guarantee their investments, and as staying in the top tier of football earns them the most money, they are entitled to make such suggestion. But this plan opens many cans of worms. Who, from the current crop of teams, stays in the Premier League? Who decides these things? If there is no promotion, would the teams in the lower leagues be motivated to perform? This would possibly mean the ruin of the Championship. Parachute payments which are made to relegated clubs will dry out. These parachute payments are what give the relegated teams the chance to bounce back into the top league. Relegation threatened clubs would be the most benefited with this idea. But that will also mean a loss of motivation to move out of the traditional relegation zone. A method to punish such clubs would then be required. If one is looking at American sports as a reference, then look no further than the NFL. In 2008, the Detroit Lions finished the season without a single victory. Though ridiculed, they were never really punished. In fact, they were “awarded” the first pick of the fresh talent from the next season. I agree that the draft system is unique and gives equal opportunities to teams performing poorly to add strength to their ranks. But there is no draft system in football and there would also be no punishment for coming in 20th.
In addition to this, the excitement of the relegation battle will be lost. The five-side struggle last season we witnessed, was like nothing before. Watching Match of the Day highlights, they way they switched from game to game as things happened around the country created even more intrigue and excitement. One could see the agony of Birmingham fans and players as Pavlyuchenko scored in the 90th minute goal. You could sense the jubilation in Wigan at the final whistle. Such drama would be lost forever.
If you want to look at American sports as a golden sporting market, then adopt the more useful strategies. Apply the concept of salary caps to each team. This will ensure that no top team can buy the cream of the players available by offering them inflated deals. It is natural for a sportsman to sign under the largest pay number. But if teams are limited in the amount of money they spend on players, then a Manchester City would not be able to pack the City of Manchester Stadium with superstars (alright, not all of them are). UEFA is bringing in the Financial Fair Play Rule. But that is just a small hurdle for the teams, and eventually a way will be found around it. Moreover, it essentially looks at what the clubs spends and earns and puts a relation between that. No efforts are made to look beneath the numbers to see where the money is moving in and out from. Manchester City have already found a loophole by giving away the naming rights to Etihad, basically the company of its owners. A salary cap would be a massive step to see that there is minimal disparity in the sport.
Money is the root of all evil. This old cliché holds firm with the new ideas being thrown into the ring these days. All such ideas look at making teams (and hence companies and investments) stronger, richer and successful. None of them talk about doing the same for the sport itself.

'Blackburn’t Nuggets

As I write this, the Blackburn squad, what remains of it, travels to India to play the Red Lizards of Pune over the weekend. It’s a nice way to get away from the pressures of Blackburn and get on with some team-building and sight-seeing. That’s possibly the view of manager Steve Kean. My guess would be that he rather fancies the fact that he’s getting away from the fans who have been asking for his head for some time now and almost sang him out after a crushing defeat at the hands of Manchester City.
Venky’s has made a right mess of the team that is the only one outside Manchester United, Arsenal and Chelsea to have won the Premier League. Of course, that came due to the spending spree that then owner Jack Walker went on, purchasing the likes of Alan Shearer. But as we look back over the past 12 months, Venky’s have taken a mid-table stable club to the relegation-threatened one. These guys came in with high standards and ridiculous claims. Everything happened with the help of the dubious Jerome Anderson, who is an agent and works for SEM. This firm, along with their partner, Kentaro, has apparently influenced the owners’ decisions all the way.

First, and up until now, the most controversial and damaging decision was to let go Sam Allardyce. A manager who brought them from the brink of relegation and stabilized them was removed over alleged signing issues. Anderson and Kentaro’s decisions to sign some players went against the manager and Venky’s went about removing the obstacle and installing Steve Kean, a man represented by Jerome Anderson himself. If that was not enough, the team signed a pre-contract with Jerome Anderson’s son, Myles. Then came the ludicrous claims of bringing in Ronaldinho and Raul. For a club battling relegation, this was not just a mere stretch, but a fantasy. Kean went on claiming that contracts for these players would be worked out in the near term and tried to calm reports of this just being a dream. Of course, the two did not come to the club, as expected. But in place he bought a Scottish unknown, Goodwillie.
Such preposterous decisions have been the reason that Venky’s now is a joke on the UK. Being called “poultry farmers” all along, the Indian owners are ridiculed in every section of the paper. After a poor run last year, Kean somehow managed to pull off a miracle and keep Blackburn afloat. The owners must have been delighted, but their management will always be in question. Take for instance, Kean travels to India once a month to chat with Anuradha Desai, the matriarch of the Venky’s venture. The brothers are seen at games wearing suits and sporting ponytails, trying to understand what is unfolding before them. Clearly they bought this club to promote their product, they aren’t the first. But then use your players to make a ridiculous advert to sell that product was nonsensical. I would be amazed to know how many people in India know any Blackburn player. These people know nothing of what football is, in England at least. Without understanding the culture of football, Venky’s has dived into a pool without learning to swim.
And mind you, the team is not bad. It’s a team a good manager can keep in the middle of the table, maybe even squeaking into the top half. Players like Samba, Robinson, Johnson and many others may warrantee a place in many other squads around the league. But the fault lies with the owners for getting rid of a popular and successful manager and rocking the boat that already had a few holes in it. Then to steady the boat, they brought in a manager who has never managed a first team and never really played at the highest level. Kean has been the whipping boy of the league this season and only saw fewer columns in the papers because Arsene Wenger was making a fool of himself elsewhere.
The current season has started very badly and there is no indication that this will improve without the manager going, or some drastic change in the players and tactics. They are out of sorts and out of ideas. The lonesome win in the League came against a clueless Arsenal that did more for Blackburn than Blackburn itself. After the win, Kean tried to make good with the press and fans by interviewing for everyone who asked him the time, in the process saying how his team was back. Nobody pointed out to him that they had only beaten Arsenal who were thrashed at Old Trafford, scraped a win against Swansea and were beaten thoroughly by Liverpool. And who scored more goals than they did in the match for Blackburn.

It’s not a team that gets a lot of mentions around the place, but I felt it was worth displaying the carelessness and stupidity that has been going on at the club for the past year. Blackburn has Venky’s to blame and Venky’s have themselves to blame. Whatever the owners might say to calm the supporters, they cannot stop the singing from the terraces for the manager’s head. They need to make a decision fast, before the fans turn their heads against them. Then there will be hell to pay, and not even free nuggets for the season will stop the fans clucking around with protests. Right now, Blackburn is like a headless chicken, running wild. Something needs to be done to stop the chaos.

The Curios Case of Carlos Tevez

“He’s finished”. A sad Roberto Mancini said about Carlos Tevez during his post-match press conference in Munich after his side lost 2-0 in the Champions League. The want-away Argentinean has never been happy in England, away from his family. While that seems like a reason we can all relate to, how genuine it is only Tevez knows (and maybe Kia Joorabchian).
Everyone knows about his exploits. It was his emergence in Brazil at Corinthians that caught everyone’s eye in Europe. His move to London, controversially helping West Ham float with a goal at Old Trafford where he moved to

next on loan. He won medals there, including a Champions League, but then moved to United’s rivals under a cloud. He starred at Manchester City and captained the Blues to an FA Cup and a Champions League place. And now we are in the present, where things have come to a head and he seems destined to spend the remaining part of the year without stepping onto the Etihad complex.
Carlos Tevez has never been a person to stand at one place at a time, literally and figuratively. On the pitch, he is bustling about winning tackles of creating spaces for himself or running with the ball. Off it, he’s changing clubs with regular intervals. At every club he has played for, he has left whining and complaining about something at that place. He was not completely happy at Boca Juniors in Argentina, and made a move to Brazil to play for Corinthians. After a successful year at Corinthians, he was reported to be unhappy in Brazil. Complains about the difficulty of non-Brazilians playing in Brazil was at the top of the list. Tevez refused to play for Corinthians and in 2006 he was sold to West Ham United for an undisclosed fee. At Upton Park, he threw tantrums and made noises about being substituted. His ownership by a third party caused multiple issues as Sheffield United contested their relegation on the basis that Tevez and fellow Argentinean Mascherano had breached Premier League rules. That led to a settlement where West Ham were made to pay £20 million to United. Then came his protracted move to Old Trafford.
Manchester United, Kia Joorabchian and West Ham United went to court over the move. Rejecting moves to Inter Milan in between, Tevez was reportedly happy in England. He was a success at United and thoughts of him being a controversy seemed far and wide. But then came Alex Ferguson’s decision to not sign Tevez at the end of the season. While gathering support from the crowd, Tevez rejected an offer from United that would keep him there for five more years. The crowd at games voiced their opinion chanting “Fergie, sign him up” with Tevez cupping his ears towards the dugout. While opinion was divided over Sir Alex’s decision, Tevez signed for neighbors Manchester City. During the saga, Tevez made public his dislike for Manchester. “It rains all the time”, he complained. The press pointed out that Tevez had made little effort to learn English. While making comments like he missed his family, who were in Argentina at that time, he moved across town to the Eastlands. If Tevez wasn’t a controversial figure as of yet, he was to become one during the next couple of seasons.
His first season at City started well, and he scored against United and gestured to Sir Alex of what he had missed out on. Gary Neville had to come to his manager’s defense, having a spat with Tevez publically. During the season, Tevez performed well for City, but moaned about having no friends and his plight regarding his family again. His first season did not end in getting City anywhere but lose Mark Hughes as manager. In stepped Mancini, and a battle was about to begin. To placate Tevez, Mancini made him captain during the 2010-11 season as there were signs of him being unsettled. In December, he wanted out of City because of differences with the board and Mancini. Many pointed to the reason for this behavior as Kia Joorabchian. It was said that Joorabchian was whispering in Tevez's ear about a possible move because he himself was not getting along with the board at City. Things seemed to reach a boiling point when Tevez made a transfer request which was denied by City. He was already on a contract that made him the highest paid player at City and would remain so as a clause to keep him the highest paid player at City was inked in. With Mancini and, supposedly, Zabaleta putting out the fire, Tevez resumed normal service at the Eastlands.
Things rolled on as the season progressed and inevitably, Tevez was up against United again in the FA Cup semifinal. He apparently missed it with a hamstring injury, but insiders claimed that he was unhappy with Mancini’s strategy and said they would lose and that he didn’t want to play. He was out of the game as City one-upped over their neighbors to reach the final and eventually win the trophy. With that trophy came the news that he wanted to go to Italy. Rumors of a possible move to Inter were circulating although Tevez said he would stay in Manchester if his family issues were solved. Of course, that did not stop him from saying that he “would not even return there on vacation”. During the summer break, he returned to Argentina for the Copa America. At that time, speculations rose that he would not even return to England and Manchester City were trying to offload him, along with many others. Corinthians were lined up to buy him for a fee in the region of £40 million. Corinthians, who had made some money in the last few seasons, were willing to buy, but negotiations went south as Tevez’s salary and the transfer fee were out of their league. Links to Real Madrid and Inter still lingered, but they were just news. And so, Tevez had to remain at Eastlands, where he had vowed never to return.
As the current season has progressed, Tevez has been making himself as unpopular as he can. Being left on the bench for many games and sometimes not even substituted, his frustration has grown and with his constant desire to leave the club and country, he has been on the edge. Last season he had a touchline row with Mancini on being substituted in a game that was virtually won, with him being the man of the match. Mancini calmed the fires by applauding his passion to keep playing, apparently masking his anger and giving Tevez another chance. With repeated outcries to leave the club, he has stayed put. I bring it down to his representatives, who seem to be whispering things in his ears that unsettle him. Think back to Rooney last season, and how his agents made him doubt Sir Alex, while the Scot turned the tables on him with class. Mancini needs to do the same. He has too many egos to control in the dressing room, biggest of all that of Tevez. Sir Alex must have seen something of this behavior when he elected not to sign Tevez. Manchester United supporters, including me, must be relieved that it’s not their problem.
But everything has to come to an end, and it seems now is the time. The apparent climax of the Tevez-Manchester City relationship is in near sight. After refusing to take the field at Munich during the week, Tevez has made himself Public Enemy number one. Putting it down to a misunderstanding, he has tried to make amends. But it’s apparent that things have gone too far. Mancini, understandably, does not want him in his squad anymore. Graeme Souness labeled Tevez “a disgrace to football”. Few, if any, have come to his support. City have banned him for two weeks and are contemplating a ban for the rest of the year. From Tevez’s point of view, he is disappointed at not being put in the starting line-up regularly, and feels his manager has lost faith in him. But then, that’s his own doing.
He misses his family, fair enough. But then make the effort and move. Cesc Fabregas did something by giving up money to make his move to Barcelona happen. Why can’t Tevez? Otherwise, stay put and play on. He is a gifted player, and adored by the fans. He does not need more restaurants and no rain to keep himself happy in Manchester. He has everything. If he does miss his family, then a move to Spain or Italy does not bring them closer. Carlos Tevez will keep us tuned in till he throws in his hat. Of course, he has been threatening to do that all through last season. And maybe he will. Maybe he won’t. Maybe he’ll still be at City. Maybe he’ll be in Argentina trying to revive River Plate. Who knows. But that’s the enigma, Carlos Tevez.

FIFAgate

The winter chill has done nothing to freeze any thoughts of the monumental embarrassment that the England bid went through last week. Between now and then, every person who writes or speaks anything abut football has had his or her opinions spread around the popular media. And after being blasted with so much information myself, I thought about putting my thoughts in words as well.
First off, I am deeply disappointed that England haven't won the World Cup bid. My plans of watching England play (yes they would have because they would qualify automatically) at Wembley are now thwarted. But then, that was expected, although it did give me a shock to see that England received only one vote apart from their own. After being told that their technical bid and the presentation were apparently the best, the bid was won by Russia. Something similar happened with the other bid and the boiling desert of Qatar received the 2022 staging opportunity. So it is basically understood that I may not watch a World Cup match from a stadium till at least 2026. I'll be 42 then.
The English media now blast FIFA for the debacle, as the media normally does. Just as something goes amiss, the media pounces on the opportunity to crucify someone. Be it a manager or a team or the football governing body. They seem to have a beef with almost everyone in the world. But I believe they should have accepted that outcome. After allegations and even a show pointing out the corruption in the FIFA ExCom, they should hardly expect to be handed the bid. It's true that the corruption allegations are massive and should be dealt with, but honestly, do you expect me to be criticized and then expect my sincere thanks and then an award from me? That is just ridiculous. Of course, Sepp Blatt(bb)er did take some kind of action but never thanks the press. Bottom line, the English media did cost the World Cup for England, but that is not the main concern here.
What is important is FIFA's acceptance of multiple bids even when they follow a (unsaid) policy of handing out bids to new areas of the world. If that is what you are set out to do, then why not say only new teams should bid? Why make a country, for example England, spend 15 million pounds on a worthless cause? Another area of concern is the fact that promises were not kept. That proves that football has now become political. We all new it was, but here we have seen that with our own eyes. Blatter's audacity to say that football originated in China and then calling England the motherland of football seems a sarcastic jib at England's bid. We have 24 (22 now because of the suspensions) people in the ExCom unfairly representating 208 football associations. These men are like a dictatorship and Blatter as the dictator. "Sepp Blatter gets what Sepp Blatter wants" was a phrase I heard in many pods and that seems to be true. FIFA's ExCom, filled with crooked and corrupt people (although not proven), has too strong a hold on this game. Tim Vickery, in his blog, said that the idea of hosting the World Cup in new places is both great and problematic and that is very true.
The issues do not stop there. My main concerns was the hosting nations. Fist, Russia. A country with nine timezones. Nine. They sold FIFA on the idea that Eastern Europe never hosted a World Cup. That's what Russia has to offer. But what about infrastructure and stadiums and the lot. Russia has promised free transportation and no visas for match goers. That's really going to work. If reports are to be held true, the the UEFA Champions League final in 2008 was a failure in terms of organizations. Apart from the hospitality of FIFA and UEFA officials, they rest of the lot were faced with problems like packed buses and private jets leaving before commercial airlines. In addition, the rampant racism that exists in the country. How are fans from Africa, or even black fans from so many other countries supposed to travel. One of Russia's minister said in an interview that on every matchday during league season, black residents are advised to stay home and not venture out in fear of hooliganism mixed with racism.
Qatar next. I believe Gatorade should be the official sponsors of the World Cup in Qatar. But dehydration and extreme heat is only one issue. Qatar is so small, how are they going to manage the task of accommodating the hundreds of thousands of fans who are going to travel? Will they build new hotels, putting more stress on the economy? Qatar has promised 12 new stadiums with AC features, which will then be dismantled after the World Cup and moved to someplace else. That sounds like a grand idea. Spend money on so many stadiums just to move them somewhere else? Apart from that, small issues like Qatar not recognizing the State of Israel. What if Israel qualifies for the World Cup? What of by then we have women referees? How are European fans going to sit in that hot stadium and not be allowed to enjoy a beer because it is banned? Has FIFA considered the ramifications of the social restrictions of Qatar? Or were they blinded by the massive amount of green they were piling up in the meantime?
Last, but certainly not the least point. Russia and Qatar, oil rich countries. Rich, the important word here. Allegations are surfacing that a few ExCom members did receive kickbacks for these countries. Far-fetched? I don't think so. It is clear that the best bids haven't won, namely England, the US or Australia. Under the seemingly false pretense of taking the World Cup to places it has never been before, money may have talked. South Africa were loaned a huge amount of money just to get ready for the World Cup. Brazil are still way behind in their preparations and it is now going to cost the locals and then the spectators. Why put financial stress on a developing country that has more pressing matters to spend on. Russia and Qatar may have money, but will people travel that far?
It was a particularly long rant, but from so much I have heard in the past few days, there is still so much more on my mind. I shall watch the World Cup come 2018 and 2022, that I am sure of. But I shall be in the comfort of my own home, on a couch, with a beer in hand.

Marathi Manoos jaaga kadhi honaar!

Remember the popular dialogue by Paresh Rawal in Hera Pheri when he gets pissed off and fires the gun blindly. Well, that's just it. We need that to happen in real life.
First off, let me clarify a few things. I am a Marathi Manoos. Proud to be a Maharashtrian and an India, at the same time. How hard is it really? Secondly, Thackereys and Shiv Sena and MaNaSe do not represent me as a Marathi Manoos and I did not give them the authority to represent me and fight on behalf of me. The fight they are fighting is actually nothing to do with me, as with almost all other Maharashtrians out there. Take a poll in Maharashtra and see how many people actually believe in most things Raj Thackerey has said. I definitely agree with some of the points he makes, many of us do. But the extremities that he and his MaNaSe go knows no bounds.
And now Shiv Sena have a new goal in sight. Drive Bollywood out of Mumbai, then all the businesses and finally see Mumbai become the hapless city it would be without all this. With political might on the line, Shiv Sena seems to stir up any issue that might get them the national coverage they so desperately seek. And so they target the icons of India. What did Shahrukh Khan say wrong when he wanted Pakistani players in IPL teams. And he owns Kolkata Knight Rider, not the Mumbai Indians. So, the Pak players will go there. What has this got to do with Mumbai and hence Shiv Sena's stupid ideals. By the way, how have Thackereys remained quiet while Ambanis named the team Mumbai INDIANS??????
SRK is allowed his own opinion, as I think India is a democracy and we have freedom of speech? I remember reading that somewhere in school. Sachin is proud to be an India, and this infuriated the Sena. WHY? These are such lame battles, that no one should have even noticed them. But the media added fuel to the fire and made it into a national issue. You know, on one hand the media belittles Sena for picking these fights and on the other hand, add to the controversy by making it Hot and Breaking news. No wonder Thakereys are smiling now.
But the most mind-boggling question that I have is this. Why are these lunatics shouting and making issues out of nothing. To gain political ground, right? What does a strong political ground give them? Support, right? And support means power, right? So all they are doing is fighting for power. Well, I have a brilliant alternative to all this. Let's go retro and do what was originally done. Win the hearts and minds of the people by doing something constructive. There are many wide-range issues in the state, let alone the country. Get those straightened out. And you'll find support even when you weren't looking for it. Just repair a road, organize traffic, something tangible, and you'll see hundreds of fans lining to greet you. Why do you think SRK and Aamir and Sachin have so many followers? Because they make them happy and entertain them.
How does stopping the screening of a SRK film win you brownie points with the very public you want to win over who crave to see an SRK film. Fight the battles that need fighting. You have even me blogging to voice my opinion. And please decide what you want first too. You want to oppose Islam by keeping Pak players out of India, or you want to oppose non-Marathis to save Maharashtra? Both these don't make sense, but still, with your limited outlook, choose.

Time for some answers

One fine night in May last year, at approximately 12am I was dreading the wait for the return of a beloved series. LOST finally returns in a few hours and countless souls are waiting, holding their breath as 2 extraordinary hours of the sixth (and yes, final) season are broadcast today. While I write this, listening to the LOST soundtrack, I am actually feeling a rush like none other. 

After Juliet hit that stupid Jughead with a rock and the white flash was shown, I was hell-bent on finding out what-why-when-how happened. Reading every word I could get my hands on, peeking at every sneak peek with disapproval for my actions and scratching my head over the thousands of mysteries I find myself baffled with, I am happy to say that the wait is over. The writers seemed to have kept a tight wrap on things but that hasn't stopped people from snooping around and feeding sorry souls like us with tidbits that kept us hanging and asking for a little more every time 

I cannot remember a time when I waiting with such anticipation for anything. Thanks to the almighty DVR I pay for, I did not scythe off the people who made plans for tonight. It is going to be a hurried dinner and then 3 hours of numbness while I get even more numb as the drama unfolds. I really think I need a bottle of scotch ready to drain so that I can fall asleep tonight without being bothered by the cliff-hanger tonight's episode will surely have. 

I want to say it has been a fruitful wait, but I'll hang on to those words till I see off tonight. And then the next 4 odd months till the series finally closes.

I am actually fantasizing that the series will end in a manner in which it started, "with the closing of Jack's eyes" and the end of the journey.

The beginning of the end is here and I cannot wait for it ...

World Cup almost ...

I was so hoping for something spectacular from the draw today.But there was some disappointment. First off, no video. Come on! And that too when Charlize Theron was looking amazing. Second, no serious group of death. That was sad. But there was some respite, Brazil, Ivory Coast and Portugal. That's a brutal combination and if Drogba has anything to say, that will just make it more interesting. My only hope is Portugal does to Brazil what it always does to England.
Speaking of England, US and they in the smae group. Sounds interesting but is actually very banal. US coach Bradley wants 1950 spirit whe US last beat England. You gotta be kidding. He wasn't born then. Why has he got to create a rivalry where there isn't one?
The dummy draw actually had a funny moment. When Charlize pulled out France, she actually called out Ireland. Yikes, that must have hurt in Dublin. Anyways, at least now this nonsense can come to an end and we can get down to serious business. June cannot come sooner.

Draw ...

France v Germany in the league stage? That's a possibility. The draw id on Friday and FIFA did something nasty. They placed France in the unseeded pot, apparently because of Henry's cheating tactics against Ireland. Speaking of which, clever Henry knows FIFA cannot allow all the bull that Ireland FA are throwing at FIFA and so he accepts hat he cheated and tries to pull the woll over our eyes. Not so fast!
Ireland went to FIFA and asked them to add a 33rd team to the draw, namely them. Are they serious? 33 teams? Can you imagine the statistical nightmare that may follow and every team in the history of football wanting to be treated fairly. Hell, even England might come out and protest against the "Hand of God" again and book a place in the final.
That reminds me, Maradona is apparently warned that if he comes to the draw, he will be kicked out. That's a nice way to talk to a legend, but he did it first. Nasty fellow. No wonder Argentina sucks and Tevez wants out.
Berbatov got a haircut, no more hairband and long streaks slowing his pace. And who knew he was balding. Fatherhood seems to have brought hm down to earth. Hope that form he showed at Spurs returns to aid United.

Man uddhaN Vaaryache (marathi lyrics) - मन उद्धाण वार्याचे

FYI ... please use this and edit it as needed ....

मायेच्या हळव्या स्पर्शाने खुलते, नात्यांच्या बंधात धुंध मोहरते
मायेच्या हळव्या स्पर्शाने खुलते, नात्यांच्या बंधात धुंध मोहरते
मन उद्धाण वार्याचे, गूज पावसाचे
का होते बेभान कसे गहिवरते
मन उद्धाण वार्याचे, गूज पावसाचे
का होते बेभान कसे गहिवरते
मन उद्धाण वार्याचे

तनाना...

आकाशी स्वप्नांच्या हरपून भान शिरते
हुरहुरत्या सांजेला कधी एकटेच झुलते
सावरते बावरते धडते अडखळते का पडते
कधी आशेच्या हिंदोळ्यावर मन हे वेडे झुलते
मन तरंग होऊन पाण्यावरती फिरते
अन क्षणात फिरुनी आभाळाला भिडते

मन उद्धाण वार्याचे, गूज पावसाचे
का होते बेभान कसे गहिवरते
मन उद्धाण वार्याचे, गूज पावसाचे
का होते बेभान कसे गहिवरते
मन उद्धाण वार्याचे

रुणझुणते गुणगुणते कधी गुंतते हरवते
कधी गहिऱ्या डोळ्यांच्या डोहात पार बुडते
तळमळते सारखे बापडे नकळत का भरकटते
कधी मोहाच्या चार क्षणांना मन हे वेडे भुलते
जाणते जरी जे पुन्हा पुन्हा का चुकते
भापडे जरी भासांच्या मागून पळते

मन उद्धाण वार्याचे, गूज पावसाचे
का होते बेभान कसे गहिवरते
मन उद्धाण वार्याचे, गूज पावसाचे
का होते बेभान कसे गहिवरते
मन उद्धाण वार्याचे

It’s a secret, that’s why!

After reading "The da Vinci Code" I was certainly intrigued about the whole, Jesus is married and has a blood-line, theory. Not knowing much about Christianity, it makes for a neutral like me to enjoy the occasional jab at someone else's mysterious religion. And being an agnostic makes it even more fun. Mind you, an atheist would have loaded his gun and gone berserk, and they have. But for me it was entertainment and reading about what people on both sides felt was amusing.

Then last night I watched the National Geographic and the History Channel takes on "decoding" the theories in the book. What they presented was proof that it was all lies, blasphemy and so on. Not that they actually said those words, but anyone would guess that's what they meant. Now who in the world would want to say that I wonder?

Now to be concise, the book states that there was a "secret" society. It was proved that the society as created by some Frenchman just to get his hands on royalty. And it was said that there is no proof that a secret society existed. Now isn't this a contradictory statement in itself? It is secret, hence no proof.

And even if Jesus was married, how would his message change? How would people think, "Oh he was married, then he is not a Messaih!" Just because he did not happen to throw a lavish party calling everyone to his wedding or having his reception at The Plaza, doesn't mean he may not have been married. It might be a stretch to agree that the Priory of Sion existed, but who says it can't. In the world, everyone has the right to question everything, so why have people taken to resentment when such questions are asked?

Like I said before, I am an agnostic and I seem to enjoy conspiracies and so this book was a wonderful read for me. The documentaries providing proof against it were entertaining too. But let's just keep it at that. What people did in India was just another way to get your 15 minutes of fame. In a democratic country like India, the largest I may add, if someone wants to say something against a religion, then he is cursed and burned.

My point is, if something didn't exist, but you cannot prove that it didn't, it may have existed. It's like being innocent until proven guilty.